ATO Technology logo dark

A Comparative Study on Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Differently Atomized 316L Stainless Steel

The paper focuses on the advancements in Additive Manufacturing (AM) and the growing demand for small gradation metallic powders. It presents a comparative study between two methods of producing 316L stainless steel powders: Ultrasonic Atomization (UA) and Plasma Arc Gas Atomization (PAGA). The study begins by analyzing the powder particle statistical distribution, chemical composition, density, and flowability of the powders produced by both methods. Subsequently, test samples are produced using AM to observe differences in microstructure, porosity, and hardness. The study concludes with an analysis of mechanical properties, including tensile testing with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and Charpy’s impact tests. The research finds that both ultrasonic and gas atomization methods can produce materials with similar properties, which is significant for the AM industry.


Customization and Efficiency in Powder Production

The study highlights that Ultrasonic Atomization (UA) can produce powders with targeted particle sizes and is more efficient, especially for smaller batches. This raises the question of how this efficiency and customization can revolutionize the production of specialized materials in various industries.

Quality Control in Powder Production

Ensuring the quality of the powder is crucial for its application in Additive Manufacturing. The paper discusses the importance of process stability and low porosity. What new quality control measures and standards need to be developed to ensure the reliability of powders produced through these new methods?

Future of Additive Manufacturing

With the advent of new methods for powder production, such as Ultrasonic Atomization, how will this impact the future of Additive Manufacturing? Will it lead to more cost-effective production, and how can it be scaled for mass production?


Fill in the form and get a PDF in your inbox